This week was my parents
anniversary, so it’s kind of funny that this week we
discussed parenting. We discussed specifically the
purposes of parenting and who benefits from how we parent.
I, however, want to express how these same
lessons, techniques and skills can work in other relationships.
I have a close friend,
who I have known for many years, who I often feel a parent towards. I have
started reflecting more and more on why, and began recognizing in my classes why
she often felt like my child.
My friend, I didn’t realize, was
using me as a crutch. The other problem being that I didn’t realize I was falling
into that role. I was turning into a pampering parent, where I almost did
everything for her. Not good, for her or me. I first started realizing about three months into living with
her. While we had been friends for years, it was a completely different
experience living with her my first semester at college. It became hard on me
emotionally, and mentally. She was starting to be abusive and manipulative,
just in small ways, but I see red flags before most people. I moved out for the
next semester, but still saw her frequently. Because I was no longer living there,
she wanted to hang out and spend time together more often. I had to take more
thought as to the things I was doing and became friends with someone who was starting
to see what I saw. He gave me a different perspective and allowed me to see
that I wasn’t imagining things. I HAD become a crutch and I was beginning to
realize I was also becoming used to that role, and within a few months of being
a friend I could now easily fall into that role. I needed to come out from
under her without knocking her over, but I also needed to do it quickly. I slowly
began this process by allowing her to be affected by natural consequences, and
then logical ones, which we will discover today.
- This is what really spoke to me from this
week’s classes –
Popkins’ “Problem-Handling Model”.
When we have a problem/issue, the
first thing we have to realize is there is both a perpetrator and an owner of
the problem. These two, however, are not always the same person. Let me
explain. Say your 8-year-old son doesn’t want to go to school and you try and
wake him up and he refuses to do anything. Your 8-year-old son is the
perpetrator, but who owns the problem? Ownership has a very different meaning
than it used to, in the 1828 dictionary states it as “Property; exclusive right
of possession; legal or just claim or title.” Too often we only think property
and then move on. “Legal or just claim” would work well here though, as the
parent has a legal right to educate their child and lays claim to certain
consequences of disregarding those laws. Even past that they have a
responsibility the own to that child. If the child doesn’t apply themselves or
cheats their way through school that is on them and they own those
consequences. An easy way to find out who owns the problem is filling in the
blank in this sentence. This is a problem for _______. Also consider, who is
being affected, and who cares.
In this model we talk about natural
consequences, logical consequences and punishments/rewards.
Natural consequences just like it
appears, could be anything from a kid touches the hot stovetop and burns his
hand, to a child running in street who gets hit by a car. Mostly, besides in
the case of being hit by the car, these are things our children can
constructively learn from by experiencing. Now, this being the case, there are
some times we should step in and protect our children from natural consequences.
We talked about three specifically,
1.
When it is too dangerous (if
they are playing by the street, even though they have been told not to, we are
there to tell them they have lost privileges when they don’t listen- instead of
just letting them play and hoping they listen).
2.
Too far in the future to make a good
impact or any difference – if they don’t actually learn anything until it is
too late (they go to jail, realize they should have gone to high school at 30,
etc…)
3.
If it’s harmful to others – If its effects
hurt others what are we really teaching our child(ren)?
Many of these things will teach our children
best and prepare them for real world experiences. If we can’t help them
recognize what they will face and prepare them for it, then we are not truly
using our place as father or mother to its fullest potential. Our children will
learn best by our examples, behaviors and how we parent.
Logical consequences
are logically connected to natural consequences. They must:
-
Be
discussed beforehand with child
-
Be the plan
for when a polite request to behave/mind are disregarded
-
Are if/then
or when/then statements
-
Always be
followed through with the first time
-
Be firm and
friendly when discussed
-
Be something
you are willing to follow through on
-
Involve the
child in the discussion
-
Not be
final, give the child another chance.
Finally, the third
option is punishments and rewards. This option is the worst, yielding immediate
results perhaps, but nothing lasting is learned. This is when we bribe,
manipulate or coerce or children to obedience and/or desired behavior.
No comments:
Post a Comment